Hyogo
Framework for Action 2005-2015:
Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters (HFA)
Contents
| I. |
Preamble |
| |
A. |
Challenges
posed by disasters |
| |
B. |
The
Yokohama Strategy: lessons learned and gaps
identified |
| |
|
|
|
| II. |
World
Conference on Disaster Reduction: Objectives,
expected outcome and strategic goals |
| |
A. |
Objectives |
| |
B. |
Expected
outcome |
| |
C. |
Strategic
goals |
| |
|
|
|
| III. |
Priorities
for action 2005-2015 |
| |
A. |
General
considerations |
| |
B. |
Priorities
for action |
| |
|
1. |
Ensure
that disaster risk reduction is a national
and a local priority with a strong institutional
basis for implementation |
| |
|
2. |
Identify,
assess and monitor disaster risks and enhance
early warning |
| |
|
3. |
Use
knowledge, innovation and education to build
a culture of safety and resilience at all
levels |
| |
|
4. |
Reduce
the underlying risk factors |
| |
|
5. |
Strengthen
disaster preparedness for effective response
at all levels |
| |
|
|
|
| IV. |
Implementation
and follow-up |
| |
A. |
General
considerations |
| |
B. |
States |
| |
C. |
Regional
organizations and institutions |
| |
D. |
International
organizations |
| |
E. |
The
International Strategy for Disaster Reduction |
| |
F. |
Resource
mobilization |
| |
|
|
|
Annex
Some multilateral developments related to disaster risk reduction |
I. Preamble
1. The World Conference on Disaster Reduction
was held from 18 to 22 January 2005 in Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, and adopted
the present Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of
Nations and Communities to Disasters (here after referred to as the “Framework
for Action”). The Conference provided a unique opportunity to promote
a strategic and systematic approach to reducing vulnerabilities[1] and
risks to hazards.[2] It underscored
the need for, and identified ways of, building the resilience of nations
and communities to disasters.[3]
A. Challenges posed by disasters
1. Disaster loss is on the rise with grave consequences
for the survival, dignity and livelihood of individuals, particularly
the poor, and hard-won development gains. Disaster risk is increasingly
of global concern and its impact and actions in one region can have an
impact on risks in another, and vice versa. This, compounded by increasing
vulnerabilities related to changing demographic, technological and socio-economic
conditions, unplanned urbanization, development within high-risk zones,
under-development, environmental degradation, climate variability, climate
change, geological hazards, competition for scarce resources, and the
impact of epidemics such as HIV/AIDS, points to a future where disasters
could increasingly threaten the world’s economy, and its population
and the sustainable development of developing countries. In the past
two decades, on average more than 200 million people have been affected
every year by disasters.
2. Disaster risk arises when hazards interact
with physical, social, economic and environmental vulnerabilities. Events
of hydrometeorological origin constitute the large majority of disasters.
Despite the growing understanding and acceptance of the importance of
disaster risk reduction and increased disaster response capacities, disasters
and in particular the management and reduction of risk continue to pose
a global challenge.
3. There is now international acknowledgement that efforts to reduce
disaster risks must be systematically integrated into policies, plans
and programmes for sustainable development and poverty reduction, and
supported through bilateral, regional and international cooperation,
including partnerships. Sustainable development, poverty reduction, good
governance and disaster risk reduction are mutually supportive objectives,
and in order to meet the challenges ahead, accelerated efforts must be
made to build the necessary capacities at the community and national
levels to manage and reduce risk. Such an approach is to be recognized
as an important element for the achievement of internationally agreed
development goals, including those contained in the Millennium Declaration.
5. The importance of promoting disaster risk reduction efforts on the
international and regional levels as well as the national and local levels
has been recognized in the past few years in a number of key multilateral
frameworks and declarations.[4]
B. The Yokohama Strategy: lessons learned and gaps identified
6. The Yokohama Strategy for a Safer World: Guidelines for Natural Disaster
Prevention, Preparedness and Mitigation and its Plan of Action (“Yokohama
Strategy”), adopted in 1994, provides landmark guidance on reducing
disaster risk and the impacts of disasters.
7. The review of progress made in implementing the Yokohama Strategy[5] identifies
major challenges for the coming years in ensuring more systematic action
to address disaster risks in the context of sustainable development and
in building resilience through enhanced national and local capabilities
to manage and reduce risk.
8. The review stresses the importance of disaster risk reduction being
underpinned by a more pro-active approach to informing, motivating and
involving people in all aspects of disaster risk reduction in their own
local communities. It also highlights the scarcity of resources allocated
specifically from development budgets for the realization of risk reduction
objectives, either at the national or the regional level or through international
cooperation and financial mechanisms, while noting the significant potential
to better exploit existing resources and established practices for more
effective disaster risk reduction.
9. Specific gaps and challenges are identified in the following five
main areas:
(a)
Governance: organizational, legal and policy
frameworks;
(b) Risk identification, assessment, monitoring and early warning;
(c) Knowledge management and education;
(d) Reducing underlying risk factors;
(e) Preparedness for effective response and recovery.
These
are the key areas for developing a relevant framework
for action for the decade 2005–2015.
II. World Conference
on Disaster Reduction: Objectives, expected outcome
and strategic goals
A.
Objectives
10. The World Conference on Disaster Reduction was convened by decision
of the General Assembly, with five specific objectives:[6]
(a)
To conclude and report on the review of the
Yokohama Strategy and its Plan of Action, with
a view to updating the guiding framework on
disaster reduction for the twenty-first century;
(b) To identify specific activities aimed at ensuring the implementation
of relevant provisions of the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation of
the World Summit on Sustainable Development on vulnerability, risk
assessment and disaster management;
(c) To share good practices and lessons learned to further disaster
reduction within the context of attaining sustainable development,
and to identify gaps and challenges;
(d) To increase awareness of the importance of disaster reduction policies,
thereby facilitating and promoting the implementation of those policies;
(e) To increase the reliability and availability of appropriate disaster-related
information to the public and disaster management agencies in all regions,
as set out in relevant provisions of the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation.
B. Expected outcome
11. Taking these objectives into account, and drawing on the conclusions
of the review of the Yokohama Strategy, States and other actors participating
at the World Conference on Disaster Reduction (hereinafter referred to
as “the Conference”) resolve to pursue the following expected
outcome for the next 10 years:
The substantial reduction of disaster losses, in lives and in the social,
economic and
environmental assets of communities and countries.
The realization of this outcome will require the full commitment and
involvement of all actors concerned, including governments, regional
and international organizations, civil society including volunteers,
the private sector and the scientific community.
C. Strategic goals
12. To attain this expected outcome, the Conference resolves to adopt
the following strategic goals:
(a)
The more effective integration of disaster
risk considerations into sustainable development
policies, planning and programming at all levels,
with a special emphasis on disaster prevention,
mitigation, preparedness and vulnerability
reduction;
(b) The development and strengthening of institutions, mechanisms and
capacities at all levels, in particular at the community level, that
can systematically contribute to building resilience[7] to
hazards;
(c) The systematic incorporation of risk reduction approaches into
the design and implementation of emergency preparedness, response and
recovery programmes in the reconstruction of affected communities.
III. Priorities for action 2005–2015
A.
General considerations
13. In determining appropriate action to achieve the expected outcome
and strategic goals, the Conference reaffirms that the following general
considerations will be taken into account:
(a)
The Principles contained in the Yokohama Strategy
retain their full relevance in the current
context, which is characterized by increasing
commitment to disaster reduction;
(b) Taking into account the importance of international cooperation
and partnerships, each State has the primary responsibility for its
own sustainable development and for taking effective measures to reduce
disaster risk, including for the protection of people on its territory,
infrastructure and other national assets from the impact of disasters.
At the same time, in the context of increasing global interdependence,
concerted international cooperation and an enabling international environment
are required to stimulate and contribute to developing the knowledge,
capacities and motivation needed for disaster risk reduction at all
levels;
(c) An integrated, multi-hazard approach to disaster risk reduction
should be factored into policies, planning and programming related
to sustainable development, relief, rehabilitation, and recovery activities
in post-disaster and post-conflict situations in disaster-prone countries;[8]
(d) A gender perspective should be integrated into all disaster risk
management policies, plans and decision-making processes, including
those related to risk assessment, early warning, information management,
and education and training;[9]
(e) Cultural diversity, age, and vulnerable groups should be taken
into account when planning for disaster risk reduction, as appropriate;
(f) Both communities and local authorities should be empowered to manage
and reduce disaster risk by having access to the necessary information,
resources and authority to implement actions for disaster risk reduction;
(g) Disaster-prone developing countries, especially least developed
countries and small island developing States, warrant particular attention
in view of their higher vulnerability and risk levels, which often
greatly exceed their capacity to respond to and recover from disasters;
(h) There is a need to enhance international and regional cooperation
and assistance in the field of disaster risk reduction through, inter
alia:
- The
transfer of knowledge, technology and expertise
to enhance capacity building for disaster
risk reduction
- The
sharing of research findings, lessons learned
and best practices
- The
compilation of information on disaster risk
and impact for all scales of disasters in
a way that can inform sustainable development
and disaster risk reduction
- Appropriate
support in order to enhance governance for
disaster risk reduction, for awareness-raising
initiatives and for capacity-development
measures at all levels, in order to improve
the disaster resilience of developing countries
- The
full, speedy and effective implementation
of the enhanced Heavily Indebted Poor Countries
Initiative, taking into account the impact
of disasters on the debt sustainability of
countries eligible for this programme
- Financial
assistance to reduce existing risks and to
avoid the generation of new risks
(i)
The promotion of a culture of prevention, including
through the mobilization of adequate resources
for disaster risk reduction, is an investment
for the future with substantial returns. Risk
assessment and early warning systems are essential
investments that protect and save lives, property
and livelihoods, contribute to the sustainability
of development, and are far more cost-effective
in strengthening coping mechanisms than is
primary reliance on post-disaster response
and recovery;
(j) There is also a need for proactive measures, bearing in mind that
the phases of relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction following a
disaster are windows of opportunity for the rebuilding of livelihoods
and for the planning and reconstruction of physical and socio-economic
structures, in a way that will build community resilience and reduce
vulnerability to future disaster risks;
(k) Disaster risk reduction is a cross-cutting issue in the context
of sustainable development and therefore an important element for the
achievement of internationally agreed development goals, including
those contained in the Millennium Declaration. In addition, every effort
should be made to use humanitarian assistance in such a way that risks
and future vulnerabilities will be lessened as much as possible.
B.
Priorities for action
14. Drawing on the conclusions of the review of the Yokohama Strategy,
and on the basis of deliberations at the World Conference on Disaster
Reduction and especially the agreed expected outcome and strategic goals,
the Conference has adopted the following five priorities for action:
- Ensure
that disaster risk reduction is a national
and a local priority with a strong institutional
basis for implementation.
- Identify,
assess and monitor disaster risks and enhance
early warning.
- Use
knowledge, innovation and education to build
a culture of safety and resilience at all
levels.
- Reduce
the underlying risk factors.
- Strengthen
disaster preparedness for effective response
at all levels.
- In
their approach to disaster risk reduction,
States, regional and international organizations
and other actors concerned should take into
consideration the key activities listed under
each of these five priorities and should
implement them, as appropriate, to their
own circumstances and capacities.
1.
Ensure that disaster risk reduction is a
national and a local priority with a strong
institutional basis for implementation
16. Countries that develop policy, legislative and institutional frameworks
for disaster risk reduction and that are able to develop and track
progress through specific and measurable indicators have greater capacity
to manage risks and to achieve widespread consensus for, engagement
in and compliance with disaster risk reduction measures across all
sectors of society.
Key activities:
(i)
National institutional and legislative
frameworks
(a) Support the creation and strengthening of national integrated
disaster risk reduction mechanisms, such as multi sectoral national
platforms[10],
with designated responsibilities at the national through to the local
levels to facilitate coordination across sectors. National platforms
should also facilitate coordination across sectors, including by
maintaining a broad based dialogue at national and regional levels
for promoting awareness among the relevant sectors.
(b) Integrate risk reduction, as appropriate, into development policies
and planning at all levels of government, including in poverty reduction
strategies and sectors and multi sector policies and plans.
(c) Adopt, or modify where necessary, legislation to support disaster
risk reduction, including regulations and mechanisms that encourage
compliance and that promote incentives for undertaking risk reduction
and mitigation activities.
(d) Recognize the importance and specificity of local risk patterns
and trends, decentralize responsibilities and resources for disaster
risk reduction to relevant sub-national or local authorities, as
appropriate.
(ii)
Resources
(e) Assess existing human resource capacities for disaster risk reduction
\at all levels and develop capacity-building plans and programmes
for meeting ongoing and future requirements.
(f) Allocate resources for the development and the implementation
of disaster risk management policies, programmes, laws and regulations
on disaster risk reduction in all relevant sectors and authorities
at all levels of administrative and budgets on the basis of clearly
prioritized actions.
(g) Governments should demonstrate the strong political determination
required to
promote and integrate disaster risk reduction into development programming.
(iii)
Community participation
(h) Promote community participation in disaster risk reduction through
the adoption of specific policies, the promotion of networking, the
strategic management of volunteer resources, the attribution of roles
and responsibilities, and the delegation and provision of the necessary
authority and resources.
2.
Identify, assess and monitor disaster risks
and enhance early warning
17. The starting point for reducing disaster risk and for promoting
a culture of disaster resilience lies in the knowledge of the hazards
and the physical, social, economic and environmental vulnerabilities
to disasters that most societies face, and of the ways in which hazards
and vulnerabilities are changing in the short and long term, followed
by action taken on the basis of that knowledge.
Key
activities:
(i)
National and local risk assessments
(a) Develop, update periodically and widely disseminate risk maps
and related information to decision-makers, the general public and
communities at risk[11] in
an appropriate format.
(b) Develop systems of indicators of disaster risk and vulnerability
at national and sub-national scales that will enable decision-makers
to assess the impact of disasters[12] on
social, economic and environmental conditions and disseminate the
results to decisionmakers, the public and populations at risk.
(c) Record, analyse, summarize and disseminate statistical information
on disaster occurrence, impacts and losses, on a regular bases through
international, regional, national and local mechanisms.
(ii) Early warning
(d) Develop early warning systems that are people centered, in particular
systems whose warnings are timely and understandable to those at
risk, which take into account the demographic, gender, cultural and
livelihood characteristics of the target audiences, including guidance
on how to act upon warnings, and that support effective operations
by disaster managers and other decision makers.
(e) Establish, periodically review, and maintain information systems
as part of early warning systems with a view to ensuring that rapid
and coordinated action is taken in cases of alert/emergency.
(f) Establish institutional capacities to ensure that early warning
systems are well integrated into governmental policy and decision-making
processes and emergency management systems at both the national and
the local levels, and are subject to regular system testing and performance
assessments.
(g) Implement the outcome of the Second International Conference
on Early Warning held in Bonn, Germany, in 2003[13],
including through the strengthening of coordination and cooperation
among all relevant sectors and actors in the early warning chain
in order to achieve fully effective early warning systems.
(h) Implement the outcome of the Mauritius Strategy for the further
implementation of the Barbados Programme of Action for the sustainable
development of small island developing States, including by establishing
and strengthening effective early warning systems as well as other
mitigation and response measures.
(iii) Capacity
(i) Support the development and sustainability of the infrastructure
and scientific, technological, technical and institutional capacities
needed to research, observe, analyse, map and where possible forecast
natural and related hazards, vulnerabilities and disaster impacts.
(j) Support the development and improvement of relevant databases
and the promotion of full and open exchange and dissemination of
data for assessment, monitoring and early warning purposes, as appropriate,
at international, regional, national and local levels.
(k) Support the improvement of scientific and technical methods and
capacities for risk assessment, monitoring and early warning, through
research, partnerships, training and technical capacity- building.
Promote the application of in situ and space-based earth observations,
space technologies, remote sensing, geographic information systems,
hazard modelling and prediction, weather and climate modelling and
forecasting, communication tools and studies of the costs and benefits
of risk assessment and early warning.
(l) Establish and strengthen the capacity to record, analyze, summarize,
disseminate, and exchange statistical information and data on hazards
mapping, disaster risks, impacts, and losses; support the development
of common methodologies for risk assessment and monitoring.
(iv)
Regional and emerging risks
(m) Compile and standardize, as appropriate, statistical information
and data on regional disaster risks, impacts and losses.
(n) Cooperate regionally and internationally, as appropriate, to
assess and monitor regional and trans-boundary hazards, and exchange
information and provide early warnings through appropriate arrangements,
such as, inter alia, those relating to the management of river basins.
(o) Research, analyse and report on long-term changes and emerging
issues that might increase vulnerabilities and risks or the capacity
of authorities and communities to respond to disasters.
3.
Use knowledge, innovation and education to
build a culture of safety and resilience
at all levels
18. Disasters can be substantially reduced if people are well informed
and motivated towards a culture of disaster prevention and resilience,
which in turn requires the collection, compilation and dissemination
of relevant knowledge and information on hazards, vulnerabilities and
capacities.
Key
activities:
(i)
Information management and exchange
(a) Provide easily understandable information on disaster risks and
protection options, especially to citizens in high-risk areas, to
encourage and enable people to take action to reduce risks and build
resilience. The information should incorporate relevant traditional
and indigenous knowledge and culture heritage and be tailored to
different target audiences, taking into account cultural and social
factors.
(b) Strengthen networks among disaster experts, managers and planners
across sectors and between regions, and create or strengthen procedures
for using available expertise when agencies and other important actors
develop local risk reduction plans.
(c) Promote and improve dialogue and cooperation among scientific
communities and practitioners working on disaster risk reduction,
and encourage partnerships among stakeholders, including those working
on the socioeconomic dimensions of disaster risk reduction.
(d) Promote the use, application and affordability of recent information,
communication and space-based technologies and related services,
as well as earth observations, to support disaster risk reduction,
particularly for training and for the sharing and dissemination of
information among different categories of users.
(e) In the medium term, develop local, national, regional and international
userfriendly directories, inventories and national information-sharing
systems and services for the exchange of information on good practices,
cost-effective and easy-to-use disaster risk reduction technologies,
and lessons learned on policies, plans and measures for disaster
risk reduction.
(f) Institutions dealing with urban development should provide information
to the public on disaster reduction options prior to constructions,
land purchase or land sale.
(g) Update and widely disseminate international standard terminology
related to disaster risk reduction, at least in all official United
Nations languages, for use in programme and institutional development,
operations, research, training curricula and public information programmes.
(ii)
Education and training
(h) Promote the inclusion of disaster risk reduction knowledge in
relevant sections of school curricula at all levels and the use of
other formal and informal channels to reach youth and children with
information; promote the integration of disaster risk reduction as
an intrinsic element of the United Nations Decade of Education for
Sustainable Development (2005–2015).
(i) Promote the implementation of local risk assessment and disaster
preparedness programmes in schools and institutions of higher education.
(j) Promote the implementation of programmes and activities in schools
for learning how to minimize the effects of hazards.
(k) Develop training and learning programmes in disaster risk reduction
targeted at specific sectors (development planners, emergency managers,
local government officials, etc.).
(l) Promote community-based training initiatives, considering the
role of volunteers, as appropriate, to enhance local capacities to
mitigate and cope with disasters.
(m) Ensure equal access to appropriate training and educational opportunities
for women and vulnerable constituencies; promote gender and cultural
sensitivity training as integral components of education and training
for disaster risk reduction.
(iii)
Research
(n) Develop improved methods for predictive multi-risk assessments
and socioeconomic cost–benefit analysis of risk reduction actions
at all levels; incorporate these methods into decision-making processes
at regional, national and local levels.
(o) Strengthen the technical and scientific capacity to develop and
apply methodologies, studies and models to assess vulnerabilities
to and the impact of geological, weather, water and climate-related
hazards, including the improvement of regional monitoring capacities
and assessments.
(iv)
Public awareness
(p) Promote the engagement of the media in order to stimulate a culture
of disaster resilience and strong community involvement in sustained
public education campaigns and public consultations at all levels
of society.
4.
Reduce the underlying risk factors
19. Disaster risks related to changing social, economic, environmental
conditions and land use, and the impact of hazards associated with
geological events, weather, water, climate variability and climate
change, are addressed in sector development planning and programmes
as well as in post-disaster situations.
Key
activities:
(i)
Environmental and natural resource management
(a) Encourage the sustainable use and management of ecosystems, including
through better land-use planning and development activities to reduce
risk and vulnerabilities.
(b) Implement integrated environmental and natural resource management
approaches that incorporate disaster risk reduction, including structural
and non-structural measures,[14] such
as integrated flood management and appropriate management of fragile
ecosystems.
(c) Promote the integration of risk reduction associated with existing
climate variability and future climate change into strategies for
the reduction of disaster risk and adaptation to climate change,
which would include the clear identification of climaterelated disaster
risks, the design of specific risk reduction measures and an improved
and routine use of climate risk information by planners, engineers
and other decision-makers.
(ii) Social and economic development
practices
(d) Promote food security as an important factor in ensuring the
resilience of communities to hazards, particularly in areas prone
to drought, flood, cyclones and other hazards that can weaken agriculture-based
livelihoods.
(e) Integrate disaster risk reduction planning into the health sector;
promote the goal of “hospitals safe from disaster” by
ensuring that all new hospitals are built with a level of resilience
that strengthens their capacity to remain functional in disaster
situations and implement mitigation measures to reinforce existing
health facilities, particularly those providing primary health care.
(f) Protect and strengthen critical public facilities and physical
infrastructure, particularly schools, clinics, hospitals, water and
power plants, communications and transport lifelines, disaster warning
and management centres, and culturally important lands and structures
through proper design, retrofitting and re-building, in order to
render them adequately resilient to hazards.
(g) Strengthen the implementation of social safety-net mechanisms
to assist the poor, the elderly and the disabled, and other populations
affected by disasters. Enhance recovery schemes including psycho-social
training programmes in order to mitigate the psychological damage
of vulnerable populations, particularly children, in the aftermath
of disasters.
(h) Incorporate disaster risk reduction measures into post-disaster
recovery and rehabilitation processes[15] and
use opportunities during the recovery phase to develop capacities
that reduce disaster risk in the long term, including through the
sharing of expertise, knowledge and lessons learned.
(i) Endeavor to ensure, as appropriate, that programmes for displaced
persons do not increase risk and vulnerability to hazards.
(j) Promote diversified income options for populations in high-risk
areas to reduce their vulnerability to hazards, and ensure that their
income and assets are not undermined by development policy and processes
that increase their vulnerability to disasters.
(k) Promote the development of financial risk-sharing mechanisms,
particularly insurance and reinsurance against disasters.
(l) Promote the establishment of public–private partnerships
to better engage the private sector in disaster risk reduction activities;
encourage the private sector to foster a culture of disaster prevention,
putting greater emphasis on, and allocating resources to, predisaster
activities such as risk assessments and early warning systems.
(m) Develop and promote alternative and innovative financial instruments
for addressing disaster risk.
(iii)
Land-use planning and other technical
measures
(n) Incorporate disaster risk assessments into the urban planning
and management of disaster-prone human settlements, in particular
highly populated areas and quickly urbanizing settlements. The issues
of informal or non-permanent housing and the location of housing
in high-risk areas should be addressed as priorities, including in
the framework of urban poverty reduction and slum-upgrading programmes.
(o) Mainstream disaster risk considerations into planning procedures
for major infrastructure projects, including the criteria for design,
approval and implementation of such projects and considerations based
on social, economic and environmental impact assessments.
(p) Develop, upgrade and encourage the use of guidelines and monitoring
tools for the reduction of disaster risk in the context of land-use
policy and planning.
(q) Incorporate disaster risk assessment into rural development planning
and management, in particular with regard to mountain and coastal
flood plain areas, including through the identification of land zones
that are available and safe for human settlement,
(r) Encourage the revision of existing or the development of new
building codes, standards, rehabilitation and reconstruction practices
at the national or local levels, as appropriate, with the aim of
making them more applicable in the local context, particularly in
informal and marginal human settlements, and reinforce the capacity
to implement, monitor and enforce such codes, through a consensus-based
approach, with a view to fostering disaster-resistant structures.
5.
Strengthen disaster preparedness for effective
response at all levels
20. At times of disaster, impacts and losses can be substantially reduced
if authorities, individuals and communities in hazard-prone areas are
well prepared and ready to act and are equipped with the knowledge
and capacities for effective disaster management.
Key
activities:
(a)
Strengthen policy, technical and institutional
capacities in regional, national and local
disaster management, including those related
to technology, training, and human and material
resources.
(b) Promote and support dialogue, exchange of information and coordination
among early warning, disaster risk reduction, disaster response,
development and other relevant agencies and institutions at all levels,
with the aim of fostering a holistic approach towards disaster risk
reduction.
(c) Strengthen and when necessary develop coordinated regional approaches,
and create or upgrade regional policies, operational mechanisms,
plans and communication systems to prepare for and ensure rapid and
effective disaster response in situations that exceed national coping
capacities.
(d) Prepare or review and periodically update disaster preparedness
and contingency plans and policies at all levels, with a particular
focus on the most vulnerable areas and groups. Promote regular disaster
preparedness exercises, including evacuation drills, with a view
to ensuring rapid and effective disaster response and access to essential
food and non-food relief supplies, as appropriate, to local needs.
(e) Promote the establishment of emergency funds, where and as appropriate,
to support response, recovery and preparedness measures.
(f) Develop specific mechanisms to engage the active participation
and ownership of relevant stakeholders, including communities, in
disaster risk reduction, in particular building on the spirit of
volunteerism.
IV. Implementation
and follow-up
A. General considerations
21. The implementation of and follow-up to the strategic goals and priorities
for action set out in this Framework for Action should be addressed by
different stakeholders in a multi-sectoral approach, including the development
sector. States and regional and international organizations, including
the United Nations and international financial institutions, are called
upon to integrate disaster risk reduction considerations into their sustainable
development policy, planning and programming at all levels. Civil society,
including volunteers and community-based organizations, the scientific
community and the private sector are vital stakeholders in supporting
the implementation of disaster risk reduction at all levels.
22. While each State has primary responsibility for its own economic
and social development, an enabling international environment is vital
to stimulate and contribute to developing the knowledge, capacities and
motivation needed to build disaster resilient nations and communities.
States and regional and international organizations should foster greater
strategic coordination among the United Nations, other international
organizations, including international financial institutions, regional
bodies, donor agencies and nongovernmental organizations engaged in disaster
risk reduction, based on a strengthened International Strategy for Disaster
Reduction. In the coming years, consideration should be given to ensuring
the implementation and strengthening of relevant international legal
instruments related to disaster risk reduction.
23. States and regional and international organizations should also support
the capacities of regional mechanisms and organizations to develop regional
plans, policies and common practices, as appropriate, in support of networking,
advocacy, coordination, exchange of information and experience, scientific
monitoring of hazards and vulnerability, and institutional capacity development
and to deal with disaster risks.
24. All actors are encouraged to build multi-stakeholder partnerships,
at all levels, as appropriate, and on a voluntary basis, to contribute
to the implementation of this Framework for Action. States and other
actors are also encouraged to promote the strengthening or establishment
of national, regional and international volunteer corps, which can be
made available to countries and to the international community to contribute
to addressing vulnerability and reducing disaster risk.[16]
25. The Mauritius Strategy for the further implementation of the Barbados
Programme of Action for Small Island Developing States underscores that
small island developing States are located among the most vulnerable
regions in the world in relation to the intensity and frequency of natural
and environmental disasters and their increasing impact, and face disproportionately
high economic, social and environmental consequences. Small island developing
States have undertaken to strengthen their respective national frameworks
for more effective disaster management and are committed, with the necessary
support of the
international community, to improve national disaster mitigation, preparedness
and earlywarning capacity, increase public awareness about disaster reduction,
stimulate interdisciplinary and inter-sectoral partnerships, mainstream
risk management into their national planning process, address issues
relating to insurance and reinsurance arrangements, and augment their
capacity to predict and respond to emergency situations, including those
affecting human settlements stemming from natural and environmental disasters.
26. In view of the particular vulnerabilities and insufficient capacities
of least developed countries to respond to and recover from disasters,
support is needed by the least developed countries as a matter of priority,
in executing substantive programmes and relevant institutional mechanisms
for the implementation of the Framework for Action, including through
financial and technical assistance and for capacity building in disaster
risk reduction as an effective and sustainable means to prevent and respond
to disasters.
27. Disasters in Africa pose a major obstacle to the African continent’s
efforts to achieve sustainable development, especially in view of the
region’s insufficient capacities to predict, monitor, deal with
and mitigate disasters. Reducing the vulnerability of the African people
to hazards is a necessary element of poverty reduction strategies, including
efforts to protect past development gains. Financial and technical assistance
is needed to strengthen the capacities of African countries, including
observation and early warning systems, assessments, prevention, preparedness,
response and recovery.
28. The follow-up on the World Conference on Disaster Reduction will,
as appropriate, be an integrated and coordinated part of the follow-up
to other major conference in fields relevant to disaster risk reduction.[17] This
should include specific reference to progress on disaster risk reduction
taking, into account agreed development goals, including those found
in the Millennium Declaration.
29. The implementation of this Framework for Action for the period 2005-2015
will be appropriately reviewed.
B. States
30. All States should endeavour to undertake the following tasks at the
national and local levels, with a strong sense of ownership and in collaboration
with civil society and other stakeholders, within the bounds of their
financial, human and material capacities, and taking into account their
domestic legal requirements and existing international instruments related
to disaster risk reduction. States should also contribute actively in
the context of regional and international cooperation, in line with paragraphs
33 and 34.
(a)
Prepare and publish national baseline assessments
of the status of disaster risk reduction, according
to the capabilities, needs and policies of
each State, and, as appropriate, share this
information with concerned regional and international
bodies;
(b) Designate an appropriate national coordination mechanism for the
implementation and follow up of this Framework for Action, and communicate
the information to the secretariat of the International Strategy for
Disaster Reduction;
(c) Publish and periodically update a summary of national programmes
for disaster risk reduction related to this Framework for Action, including
on international cooperation;
(d) Develop procedures for reviewing national progress against this
Framework for Action, which should include systems for cost benefit
analysis and ongoing monitoring and assessment of vulnerability and
risk, in particular with regards to regions exposed to hydrometeorological
and seismic hazards, as appropriate;
(e) Include information on progress of disaster risk reduction in the
reporting mechanisms of existing international and other frameworks
concerning sustainable development, as appropriate;
(f) Consider, as appropriate, acceding to, approving or ratifying relevant
international legal instruments relating to disaster reduction, and,
for State parties to those instruments, take measures for their effective
implementation;[18]
(g) Promote the integration of risk reduction associated with existing
climate variability and future climate change into strategies for the
reduction of disaster risk and adaptation to climate change; ensure
that the management of risks associated with geological hazards, such
as earthquakes and landslides, are fully taken into account in disaster
risk reduction programmes.
C.
Regional organizations and institutions
31.
Regional organizations with a role related to disaster
risk reduction are called upon to undertake the
following tasks within their mandates, priorities
and resources:
(a) Promote regional programmes, including programmes for technical
cooperation, capacity development, the development of methodologies
and standards for hazard and vulnerability monitoring and assessment,
the sharing of information and effective mobilization of resources,
in view of supporting national and regional efforts to achieve
the objectives of this Framework for Action;
(b)
Undertake and publish regional and sub-regional
baseline assessments of the disaster risk reduction
status, according to the needs identified and
in line with their mandates;
(c) Coordinate and publish periodic reviews on progress in the region
and on impediments and support needs, and assist countries, as requested,
in the preparation of periodic national summaries of their programmes
and progress;
(d) Establish or strengthen existing specialized regional collaborative
centers, as appropriate, to undertake research, training, education
and capacity building in the field of disaster risk reduction;
(e) Support the development of regional mechanisms and capacities for
early warning to disasters, including for tsunami.[19]
D.
International organizations
32. International organizations, including organizations of the United
Nations system and international financial institutions, are called upon
to undertake the following tasks within their mandates, priorities and
resources:
(a)
Engage fully in supporting and implementing
the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction,
and cooperate to advance integrated approaches
to building disasterresilient nations and communities,
by encouraging stronger linkages, coherence
and integration of disaster risk reduction
elements into the humanitarian and sustainable
development fields as set out in this Framework
for Action;
(b) Strengthen the overall capacity of the United Nations system to
assist disaster-prone developing countries in disaster risk reduction
through appropriate means and coordination and define and implement
appropriate measures for regular assessment of their progress towards
the achievement of the goals and priorities set out in this Framework
for Action, building on the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction;
(c) Identify relevant actions to assist disaster-prone developing countries
in the implementation of this Framework for Action; ensure that relevant
actions are integrated, as appropriate, into each organization’s
own scientific, humanitarian and development sectors, policies, programmes
and practices and that adequate funding is allocated for their implementation;
(d) Assist disaster-prone developing countries to set up national strategies
and plans of action and programmes for disaster risk reduction and
to develop their institutional and technical capacities in the field
of disaster risk reduction, as identified through the priorities in
this Framework for Action;
(e) Integrate actions in support of the implementation of this Framework
into relevant coordination mechanisms such as the United Nations Development
Group and the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (on humanitarian action),
including at the national level and through the Resident Coordinator
system and the United Nations Country teams. In addition, integrate
disaster risk reduction considerations into development assistance
frameworks, such as the Common Country Assessments, the United Nations
Development Assistance Framework and poverty reduction strategies;
(f) In close collaboration with existing networks and platforms, cooperate
to support globally consistent data collection and forecasting on natural
hazards, vulnerabilities and risks and disaster impacts at all scales.
These initiatives should include the development of standards, the
maintenance of databases, the development of indicators and indices,
support to early warning systems, the full and open exchange of data
and the use of in situ and remotely sensed observations;
(g) Support States with the provision of appropriate, timely and well
coordinated international relief assistance, upon request of affected
countries, and in accordance with agreed guiding principles for emergency
relief assistance and coordination arrangements.[20] Provide
this assistance with a view to reducing risk and vulnerability, improving
capacities and ensuring effective arrangements for international cooperation
for urban search and rescue assistance.[21] Ensure
that arrangements for prompt international response to reach affected
areas are being developed at national and local levels and that appropriate
linkages to recovery efforts and risk reduction are strengthened;
(h) Strengthen the international mechanisms with a view to supporting
disaster stricken States in the transition phase towards sustainable
physical, social and economic recovery and to reducing future risks.
This should include support for risk reduction activities in post-disaster
recovery and rehabilitation processes and sharing of good practices,
knowledge and technical support with relevant countries, experts and
United Nations organizations;
(i) Strengthen and adapt the existing inter-agency disaster management
training programme based on a shared, inter-agency strategic vision
and framework for disaster risk management that encompasses risk reduction,
preparedness, response and recovery.
E.
The International Strategy for Disaster Reduction
33. The partners in the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction,
in particular, the Inter-Agency Task Force on Disaster Reduction and
its members, in collaboration with relevant national, regional, international
and United Nations bodies and supported by the inter-agency secretariat
for the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, are requested
to assist in implementing this Framework for Action as follows, subject
to the decisions taken upon completion of the review process[22] of
the current mechanism and institutional arrangements:
(a)
Develop a matrix of roles and initiatives in
support of follow-up to this Framework for
Action, involving individual members of the
Task Force and other international partners;
(b) Facilitate the coordination of effective and integrated action
within the organizations of the United Nations system and among other
relevant international and regional entities, in accordance with their
respective mandates, to support the implementation of this Framework
for Action, identify gaps in implementation and facilitate consultative
processes to develop guidelines and policy tools for each priority
area, with relevant national, regional and international expertise;
(c) Consult with relevant United Nations agencies and organizations,
regional and multilateral organizations and technical and scientific
institutions, as well as interested States and civil society, with
the view to developing generic, realistic and measurable indicators,
keeping in mind available resources of individual States. These indicators
could assist States to assess their progress in the implementation
of the Framework of Action. The indicators should be in conformity
with the internationally agreed development goals, including those
contained in the Millennium Declaration; Once that first stage has
been completed, States are encouraged to develop or refine indicators
at the national level reflecting their individual disaster risk reduction
priorities, drawing upon the generic indicators.
(d) Ensure support to national platforms for disaster reduction, including
through the clear articulation of their role and value added, as well
as regional coordination, to support the different advocacy and policy
needs and priorities set out in this Framework for Action, through
coordinated regional facilities for disaster reduction, building on
regional programmes and outreach advisors from relevant partners;
(e) Coordinate with the secretariat of the Commission on Sustainable
Development to ensure that relevant partnerships contributing to implementation
of the Framework for Action are registered in its sustainable development
partnership database; (f) Stimulate the exchange, compilation, analysis,
summary and dissemination of best practices, lessons learned, available
technologies and programmes, to support disaster risk reduction in
its capacity as an international information clearinghouse; maintain
a global information platform on disaster risk reduction and a web-based
register “portfolio” of disaster risk reduction programmes
and initiatives implemented by States and through regional and international
partnerships;[23]
(g) Prepare periodic reviews on progress towards achieving the objectives
and priorities of this Framework for Action, within the context of
the process of integrated and coordinated follow-up and implementation
of United Nations conferences and summits as mandated by the General
Assembly,[24] and
provide reports and summaries to the Assembly and other United Nations
bodies, as requested or as appropriate, based on information from national
platforms, regional and international organizations and other stakeholders,
including on the follow-up to the implementation of the recommendations
from the Second International Conference on Early Warning (2003).[25]
F.
Resource mobilization
34. States, within the bounds of their financial capabilities, regional
and international organizations, through appropriate multilateral, regional
and bilateral coordination mechanisms, should undertake the following
tasks to mobilize the necessary resources to support implementation of
this Framework for Action:
(a)
Mobilize the appropriate resources and capabilities
of relevant national, regional and international
bodies, including the United Nations system;
(b) Provide for and support, through bilateral and multilateral channels,
the implementation of this Framework for Action in disaster-prone developing
countries, including through financial and technical assistance, addressing
debt sustainability, technology transfer on mutually agreed terms,
and public–private partnerships, and encourage North–South
and South–South cooperation;
(c) Mainstream disaster risk reduction measures appropriately into
multilateral and bilateral development assistance programmes including
those related to poverty eduction, natural resource management, urban
development and adaptation to climate change;
(d) Provide adequate voluntary financial contributions to the United
Nations Trust Fund for Disaster Reduction, in the effort to ensure
the adequate support for the follow-up activities to this Framework
for Action. Review the current usage and feasibility for the expansion
of this fund, inter alia, to assist disaster-prone developing countries
to set up national strategies for disaster risk reduction.
(e) Develop partnerships to implement schemes that spread out risks,
reduce insurance premiums, expand insurance coverage and thereby increase
financing for postdisaster reconstruction and rehabilitation, including
through public and private partnerships, as appropriate. Promote an
environment that encourages a culture of insurance in developing countries,
as appropriate.
| 1 |
Vulnerability
is defined as: “The conditions determined
by physical, social, economic, and environmental
factors or processes, which increase the susceptibility
of a community to the impact ofhazards”.
UN/ISDR. Geneva 2004. |
| 2 |
Hazard
is defined as: “A potentially damaging
physical event, phenomenon or human activity
that may cause the loss of life or injury,
property damage, social and economic disruption
or environmental degradation. Hazards can include
latent conditions that may represent future
threats and can have different origins: natural
(geological, hydrometeorological and biological)
or induced by human processes (environmental
degradation and technological hazards)” UN/ISDR.
Geneva 2004. |
| 3 |
The
scope of this Framework for Action encompasses
disasters caused by hazards of natural origin
and related environmental and technological
hazards and risks. It thus reflects a holistic
and multihazard approach to disaster risk management
and the relationship, between them which can
have a significant impact on social, economic,
cultural and environmental systems, as stressed
in the Yokohama Strategy (section I, part B,
letter I, p. 8). |
| 4 |
Some
of these frameworks and declarations are listed
in the annex to this document. |
| 5 |
Review
of the Yokohama Strategy and Plan of Action
for a Safer World (A/CONF.206/L.1). |
| 6 |
As
per General Assembly resolution 58/214 of 23
December 2003. |
| 7 |
Resilience: “The
capacity of a system, community or society
potentially exposed to hazards to adapt,by
resisting or changing in order to reach and
maintain an acceptable level of functioning
andstructure This is determined by the degree
to which the social system is capable of organising
itself toincrease this capacity for learning
from past disasters for better future protection
and to improve riskreduction measures.” UN/ISDR.
Geneva 2004. |
| 8 |
The
Johannesburg Plan of Implementation of the
World Summit on Sustainable Development,Johannesburg,
South Africa, 26 August-4 September 2002, paragraphs
37 and 65. |
| 9 |
As
reaffirmed at the twenty-third special session
of the General Assembly on the topic “Women2000:
gender equality, development and peace for
the twenty-first century”. |
| 10 |
The
establishment of national platforms for disaster
reduction was requested in Economic and Social
Council resolution 1999/63 and in General Assembly
resolutions 56/195, 58/214, and 58/215. The
expression “national platform” is
a generic term used for national mechanisms
for coordination and policy guidance on disaster
risk reduction that need to be multi-sectoral
and inter-disciplinary in nature, with public,
private and civil society participation involving
all concerned entities within a country (including
United Nations agencies present at the national
level, as appropriate). National platforms
represent the national mechanism for the International
Strategy for Disaster Reduction. |
| 11 |
See
footnotes 1, 2 and 3 for the scope of this
Framework for Action. |
| 12 |
See
footnotes 1, 2 and 3. |
| 13 |
As
recommended in General Assembly resolution
58/214. |
| 14 |
“Structural
measures refer to any physical construction
to reduce or avoid possible impacts of
hazards, which include engineering measures and construction of hazard-resistant
and protective
structures and infrastructure. Non-structural measures refer to policies,
awareness, knowledge development, public commitment, and methods
and operating practices, including participatory mechanisms and the
provision of information, which can reduce risk and related impacts”.
UN/ISDR.
Geneva, 2004. |
| 15 |
According
to the principles contained in General Assembly
resolution 46/182. |
| 16 |
In
compliance with General Assembly resolution
58/118 and OAS General Assembly resolution
2018
(xxxiv-0/04). |
| 17 |
As
identified in General Assembly resolution 57/270
B. |
| 18 |
Such
as the Tampere Convention on the Provision
of Telecommunication Resources for Disaster
Mitigation and Relief Operations (1998), which entered into force
8 January 2005. |
| 19 |
The
United Nations Advisory Board on Water and
Sanitation established by the Secretary-General
made an urgent appeal to halve loss of human life caused by major
water related disasters, including
tsunami, by 2015. |
| 20 |
Defined
by General Assembly resolution 46/182. |
| 21 |
Work
towards the consistent implementation of General
Assembly resolution 57/150. |
| |